"Two female victims of the 'Highgate Vampire' are being sought to help solve this decades old supernatural mystery. Editors of the on-line Highgate Vampire magazine are confident that new testimony could expose the assailant. Trystan Lewis, the magazine's editor, is particularly looking to contact Elizabeth [DELETED] and Jacqueline [DELETED]. Those with information regarding their whereabouts can contact Mr Lewis Swale on severnforteana@[DELETED].com and Mr Hogg on anthonyhogg@[DELETED].org." – ASSAP "Research Request" (ongoing from March to October)
The official ASSAP member's E-News bulletins have been constantly featuring this stalker's charter on behalf of Swale and Hogg, whom they identify, and their lackeys, Chapman and McWilliams, since March 2016. Indeed, they are still including it in bulletins and no doubt will continue to do so.
Trystan Lewis Swale and David Farrant have been invited speakers at ASSAP conferences on various occasions in the past where Seán Manchester has been the subject of defamation, and the Highgate Vampire case that he investigated has been misrepresented and ridiculed. Seán Manchester ceased giving interviews on the topic in 2011, prior to which he was never once invited by the ASSAP to present his account of what happened despite him being at the centre of the investigation and the author of The Highgate Vampire (BOS, 1985; Gothic Press, 1991). Swale was not around when the case was ongoing, and Farrant had nothing whatsoever to do with the Highgate Vampire case beyond attempts to exploit it for his own self-serving publicity. Farrant has not claimed to have investigated the case and regularly reiterates that he does not believe in vampires.
The ASSAP's chairman, Dave Wood, protested earlier this year that nobody had shown any interest in the past for Seán Manchester to discuss the case before one of his audiences. It was pondered who had shown any interest in hearing Swale or Farrant pontificate about the Highgate Vampire? There was no response from the ASSAP who are a charity and must, therefore, conform to charity regulations, which means they must demonstrate impartiality, guarantee balance and a right of reply.
As we now know, having invited Seán Manchester to rebut what was being said about him on their forum, he was banned after a mere two weeks of doing so. Hogg, McWilliams et al saw to it that the whole discussion descended into a flame war with them setting fire to every thread with their trolling.
The ASSAP continue to evince partiality by providing a platform to Hogg and Swale in order to facilitate the stalking of two innocent women who do not wish to have their names dragged into it all after half a century. One of them was not involved in the case, and is misidentified as "Lusia" by those stalking her in order to justify their behaviour. This piece of misogynistic malice originates, as does much else, with Farrant who is exacting revenge on a female whose witness statement at Highgate Magistrates Court forty-six years ago contributed to him losing a case he had brought. Jacqueline had received harassing and threatening telephone calls from this person whom she did not know and had not met. The calls were tape-recorded. Seán Manchester identified the voice.
"I had publicly released a request for Elizabeth [DELETED] and Jacqueline 'Lusia' [DELETED] to step forward to speak to me, Erin [Chapman] or Trystan [Lewis Swale] about their experiences. That sentiment echoed Manchester's claim exactly. But the most basic scrutiny will show that it simply doesn't make sense. How is asking for WITNESSES to step forward the same thing as posting up someone's (supposed) home address, especially when it was Seán [Manchester] himself who made Elizabeth and Jacqueline 'famous' in the first place?" – Anthony Hogg (13 November 2016)
Hogg, true to his trolling temperament, will not accept that the women do not wish to be contacted (after Seán Manchester made it clear that they do not), and insists on hearing it from them. That would entail them doing the very thing they wish to avoid. Hogg denies them that right, and wants both women to contact him or Swale and say that they do not wish to be contacted. He cannot see how illogical that is because what is logical, legal and moral has no bearing on the stalker's mind.
Seán Manchester did not make Jacqueline "famous," ie she is not "Lusia," as alleged by Hogg.
Elizabeth put her experience on record herself almost half a century ago, and Seán Manchester chronicled it when he came to write about the case in 1975, 1976, 1985 and 1991. Elizabeth and everyone else have since moved on, and all concerned wish to have their privacy respected.
Shortly after this blog appeared, Anthony Hogg posted on one of his Facebook hate groups:
"FoBSM also reveals why the search continues; we made it very, very clear to Manchester, repeatedly, that we were not going to take his word on the matter. The only people we were going to listen to is Jacqueline and Elizabeth. The reason is obvious: a) Manchester isn't these witnesses, b) his word is notoriously unreliable. The search still stands."
We have made it very, very clear to Hogg and his fellow stalkers that the condition he sets overrides the desire of Jacqueline and Elizabeth to have nothing to do with these people, much less explain that they do not wish to be contacted - by which time they would have created a communication they do not want. This is how stalkers operate. They always excuse their own unacceptable behaviour and blame others when their stalking does not pay off. However, enough evidence has been accumulated for a criminal case should either female fall prey to this degenerate or his accomplices.
The official ASSAP member's E-News bulletins have been constantly featuring this stalker's charter on behalf of Swale and Hogg, whom they identify, and their lackeys, Chapman and McWilliams, since March 2016. Indeed, they are still including it in bulletins and no doubt will continue to do so.
Trystan Lewis Swale and David Farrant have been invited speakers at ASSAP conferences on various occasions in the past where Seán Manchester has been the subject of defamation, and the Highgate Vampire case that he investigated has been misrepresented and ridiculed. Seán Manchester ceased giving interviews on the topic in 2011, prior to which he was never once invited by the ASSAP to present his account of what happened despite him being at the centre of the investigation and the author of The Highgate Vampire (BOS, 1985; Gothic Press, 1991). Swale was not around when the case was ongoing, and Farrant had nothing whatsoever to do with the Highgate Vampire case beyond attempts to exploit it for his own self-serving publicity. Farrant has not claimed to have investigated the case and regularly reiterates that he does not believe in vampires.
The ASSAP's chairman, Dave Wood, protested earlier this year that nobody had shown any interest in the past for Seán Manchester to discuss the case before one of his audiences. It was pondered who had shown any interest in hearing Swale or Farrant pontificate about the Highgate Vampire? There was no response from the ASSAP who are a charity and must, therefore, conform to charity regulations, which means they must demonstrate impartiality, guarantee balance and a right of reply.
As we now know, having invited Seán Manchester to rebut what was being said about him on their forum, he was banned after a mere two weeks of doing so. Hogg, McWilliams et al saw to it that the whole discussion descended into a flame war with them setting fire to every thread with their trolling.
The ASSAP continue to evince partiality by providing a platform to Hogg and Swale in order to facilitate the stalking of two innocent women who do not wish to have their names dragged into it all after half a century. One of them was not involved in the case, and is misidentified as "Lusia" by those stalking her in order to justify their behaviour. This piece of misogynistic malice originates, as does much else, with Farrant who is exacting revenge on a female whose witness statement at Highgate Magistrates Court forty-six years ago contributed to him losing a case he had brought. Jacqueline had received harassing and threatening telephone calls from this person whom she did not know and had not met. The calls were tape-recorded. Seán Manchester identified the voice.
"I had publicly released a request for Elizabeth [DELETED] and Jacqueline 'Lusia' [DELETED] to step forward to speak to me, Erin [Chapman] or Trystan [Lewis Swale] about their experiences. That sentiment echoed Manchester's claim exactly. But the most basic scrutiny will show that it simply doesn't make sense. How is asking for WITNESSES to step forward the same thing as posting up someone's (supposed) home address, especially when it was Seán [Manchester] himself who made Elizabeth and Jacqueline 'famous' in the first place?" – Anthony Hogg (13 November 2016)
Hogg, true to his trolling temperament, will not accept that the women do not wish to be contacted (after Seán Manchester made it clear that they do not), and insists on hearing it from them. That would entail them doing the very thing they wish to avoid. Hogg denies them that right, and wants both women to contact him or Swale and say that they do not wish to be contacted. He cannot see how illogical that is because what is logical, legal and moral has no bearing on the stalker's mind.
Seán Manchester did not make Jacqueline "famous," ie she is not "Lusia," as alleged by Hogg.
Elizabeth put her experience on record herself almost half a century ago, and Seán Manchester chronicled it when he came to write about the case in 1975, 1976, 1985 and 1991. Elizabeth and everyone else have since moved on, and all concerned wish to have their privacy respected.
Shortly after this blog appeared, Anthony Hogg posted on one of his Facebook hate groups:
"FoBSM also reveals why the search continues; we made it very, very clear to Manchester, repeatedly, that we were not going to take his word on the matter. The only people we were going to listen to is Jacqueline and Elizabeth. The reason is obvious: a) Manchester isn't these witnesses, b) his word is notoriously unreliable. The search still stands."
We have made it very, very clear to Hogg and his fellow stalkers that the condition he sets overrides the desire of Jacqueline and Elizabeth to have nothing to do with these people, much less explain that they do not wish to be contacted - by which time they would have created a communication they do not want. This is how stalkers operate. They always excuse their own unacceptable behaviour and blame others when their stalking does not pay off. However, enough evidence has been accumulated for a criminal case should either female fall prey to this degenerate or his accomplices.
No comments:
Post a Comment